tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10910749.post4228044996314441824..comments2023-03-25T04:24:10.585-07:00Comments on Richard Kirk on Ethics: Musing With A Hammer: OUTLAWING NATURAL LAW?RKirkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15893241965610205006noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10910749.post-91175549720434960832010-08-16T16:22:19.065-07:002010-08-16T16:22:19.065-07:00Anonymous is content with the utterly absurd propo...Anonymous is content with the utterly absurd proposition that the law is not justified in taking into account the obvious differences between men and women. If Anonymous doesn't know that those differences are not at all parallel to irrelevant differences in skin pigmentation, then anonymous is beyond help.<br /><br />Some ideas (like those put forward by anonymous and PC thinkalikes) are so RKirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15893241965610205006noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10910749.post-20075300810812560822010-03-21T18:00:50.487-07:002010-03-21T18:00:50.487-07:00You forgot to mention that Catholic Charities take...You forgot to mention that Catholic Charities takes large sums of money from the government. It is hardly discrimination, as you alledged, for the government to force organizations using its money to conform to government policies. <br /><br />Incidentally, racism too was built on the belief that obvious differences in the body indicated obvious and inherent differences in character, culture, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com